Call Us : 604.568.1586
Email : info@friuch.com
I recently caught wind of Hydro Quebec’s latest effort to control electrical utilities outside of its borders at the expense of the owners of those assets. [READ] The Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador is being overly polite in my opinion. Hydro Quebec fucked his province around the Churchill Falls hydroelectric project – a project that might have softened the blow of a dying fisheries industry was it not for Quebec.
If you’re not familiar with the Churchill Falls issue, here’s the Coles Notes version:
This, in effect, is what ruined the potential of Churchill Falls for Newfoundlanders. The project ran into financial trouble early on because it couldn’t sell power to the US (because of Quebec’s maneuvering) and guess who swooped in to bail out the project for majority ownership? Hydro Quebec. The 50 year agreement gave Hydro Quebec exclusive access to all the power Churchill Falls produced at a price even lower than what they would have paid through the wheeling agreement.
That’s what the Premier of Newfoundland is referring to when he says that Hydro Quebec took out $22 billion and left $1 billion for Newfoundland. The $22 billion is likely the amount of profit that Hydro Quebec has generated since 1971 by selling Newfoundland power on the open market while claiming a domestic shortage. This is money that by all rights, should have gone into Newfoundland’s economy.
This is why New Brunswick Power should be wary – Hydro Quebec (and by extension the Quebec government) are like sleazy loan sharks. They give the appearance of helping out their impoverished neighbours when in fact, they are setting these “friends” up for failure. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Interesting take, Crooky, and I appreciate the background that I haven’t seen elsewhere. We’re expats in NB for the year, so I have no long-term dog in the fight but have found it interesting nonetheless, and I wouldn’t want to see our friends in NB get screwed.
It sure made me suspicious that the local Daily Gleaner runs 90% positive editorial content about what a great deal it is for NB, seemingly quoting exclusively from pro-sale politicians, while basically dismissing the NFLD premier as a crank.
The bulk of the anti-deal opinions appear in the letters to the editor, many of which question what happens AFTER the 5-yr rate expires. If I were a citizen, that’s what I’d want to know…and I haven’t seen a satisfactory answer yet. Everybody’s focused on the shiny bauble of the rate freeze, which to me preys on a bunch of people who are worried about paying for heat this winter.